EN | IT | RU

19 October 2024

Summary:

1. Apostolic and Temporal Succession of St. Peter: The United Roman-Ruthenian Church (URRC) holds apostolic succession from St. Peter,
St. Andrew, and other Apostles, integrating both Western and Eastern heritage and traditions. The URRC also holds independent titular temporal patrimony and asserts its position as the closest legitimate claimant to the temporal authority of the Roman Church via succession from Pope St. Leo X, establishing its authority as the temporal successor to St. Peter.

2. The Temporal Heritage of the Roman Church: Historically, the Roman Popes held both spiritual and temporal authority over the Western Roman Empire. This duality was altered by Pope St. John Paul II’s renunciation of temporal claims other than the Vatican City-State, leading to the URRC inheriting this temporal patrimony through its succession from Pope St. Leo X, thus formalising its status as the temporal successor to St. Peter.

3. Passing of the Temporal Claims: Pope St. John Paul II's renunciation of temporal claims was definitive. Following the renunciation of the Patriarchal title by Pope St. Benedict XVI, the URRC assumed these rights automatically through historical and nobiliary succession, affirming its legitimate claim to the temporal heritage of the Roman Empire.

4. The Legacy of the Kingdom of Ruthenia: The Kingdom of Ruthenia was established by Pope Innocent IV. After its dissolution, rights reverted to the Roman Papacy by nobiliary custom. As temporal successor to St. Peter, the URRC likewise holds the temporal patrimony of Ruthenia and its associated titles and rights.

5. Pontifical Imperial State of Rome-Ruthenia: The Pontifical Imperial State of Rome-Ruthenia symbolizes the united heritage of the Roman Empire and Ruthenia, acting as a titular authority for the URRC. Although the Pontifical Imperial State neither holds nor seeks territory, the Prince-Bishop represents this dual heritage, embodying temporal sovereignty through an unbroken lineage of succession.

Conclusion: The URRC, as the direct successor of Pope St. Leo X and temporal successor of St. Peter, holds the temporal authority of both the Roman Empire and the Kingdom of Ruthenia. The Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia is recognizsed as the legitimate heir, forming the basis of the modern Pontifical Imperial State through nobiliary law.

See also the Canonical Status of the Church.

Statement on the Sacred Continuity of Rome, Holy Russia, and the Mission of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church

Declaration of the Supreme Pontiff on the Inheritance of Rome-Ruthenia

The Roman-Ruthenian Papal Title.

Read also the Statement of Mission and Service in the Church.

See also the Note on the Titles of the P.I. Houshold.

See also the title/style of Apostolic Highness.

See also Hierarchy of the Apostolic Household.

Read also about the Use of Secular-Style Dress by Clergy of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church.

1. Apostolic and Temporal Succession of St. Peter

• Premise 1: In Christian ecclesiology, apostolic succession refers to the continuous transmission of spiritual authority from the Apostles through successive bishops. The Bishop of Rome (the Roman Pope, distinct from the Coptic Orthodox or other Popes) traditionally held the patrimony of St. Peter the Apostle, encompassing both spiritual and temporal authority (Vatican, 1973; McKitterick, 2016; Prodi, 2019).
• Premise 2: The United Roman-Ruthenian Church (URRC) holds apostolic succession from St. Peter through the Churches of Rome and Antioch, and from St. Andrew the First-Called and other Apostles through various Eastern Apostolic Sees, integrating both Western and Eastern traditions (Apostolic, 2024).

• Premise 3: The URRC, while not the spiritual successor (which remains the Vatican/Roman Catholic Church), is the closest recognised claimant to the temporal lineage of the Roman Church as the direct successor of Pope St. Leo X in the Holy Roman Empire, placing it in a position to inherit the temporal authority of the Roman Empire by nobiliary succession, which is established through historical legal principles of inheritance (Coulombe, 2020).
• Premise 4: The URRC independently holds titular temporal patrimony in its own right, derived from its historic claims and noble succession, further reinforcing its temporal authority.

 

• Premise 5: No other church, state, or entity holds valid claims to the temporal patrimony of the Roman Church. The Vatican/Roman Catholic Church relinquished its temporal claims under Pope St. John Paul II (except for those tied to Vatican City), and Pope St. Benedict XVI renounced the Patriarchal title. The URRC, being the direct successor of Pope St. Leo X and the closest recognised patriarchal successor, is the only legitimate claimant to the broader temporal authority of the Roman Empire through nobiliary law and historical succession (Davis, 2018).
• Conclusion: As the temporal successor of St. Peter and the direct successor of Pope St. Leo X, holding autocephalous patriarchal authority and Apostolic Succession from St. Peter and other Apostles, the Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia, recognised Papa-Catholicos (patriarch) of Rome-Ruthenia, and Supreme Pontiff of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church, possesses both legitimate ecclesiastical and temporal authority, grounded in its Apostolic succession, its own temporal patrimony, and the historical patrimony of the Roman Church (Ullmann, 1970; Deffenbaugh, 2024).

2. The Temporal Heritage of the Roman Church

• Premise 1: Historically, the Popes of Rome held both spiritual and temporal authority over the remnants of the Western Roman Empire, with no distinction between spiritual and temporal power at that time (Geertman, 2016).
• Premise 2: The distinction between the spiritual and temporal patrimony of St. Peter emerged only following the renunciation of temporal claims of the Roman Catholic Church by Pope St. John Paul II, except for those pertaining to Vatican City.
• Premise 3: The URRC, through its direct succession from Pope St. Leo X, not only holds Apostolic authority but also inherited the temporal patrimony tied to the Roman Empire and Roman Church.
  
• Conclusion: The Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia holds significant temporal patrimony as an heir to the Roman Empire and Church, as well as segments of the Holy Roman Empire, which follows as temporal successor to St. Peter.

3. Passing of the Temporal Claims

• Premise 1: As stated, Pope St. John Paul II renounced the temporal claims of the Roman Papacy, except for those tied to Vatican City. In ecclesiastical and legal contexts, renunciation refers to the formal act of voluntarily giving up claims, rights, or authority. Once renounced, these claims or rights no longer belong to the individual or office that relinquished them and may pass to another party by succession. The renunciation by Pope St. John Paul II, therefore, was legally and symbolically final, and thus irreversible without a new formal claim or authority.
  
• Premise 2: In Christian tradition and ecclesiology, the Patriarchal title represents the highest ecclesiastical office. For the Roman Pope, all of his authority—whether spiritual or temporal—was rooted in his role as the Patriarch of the Western Church. This included not only spiritual supremacy over the Roman Communion, but also temporal authority over the historic patrimony of the Roman Empire. Thus, the Roman Pope's authority ultimately derived from his position as Patriarch (Blaudeau, 2015).

• Premise 3: In 2011, Pope St. Benedict XVI formally renounced the Patriarchal title, marking a significant shift in the governance of the Roman Church’s temporal heritage. In early Christianity and Orthodox tradition, the Patriarchal title is the highest ecclesiastical authority, and it is from this title that all spiritual and temporal authority is derived. By renouncing the title of Patriarch, Pope St. Benedict effectively severed the Roman Catholic Church’s claim to both spiritual and temporal authority beyond Vatican City. This renunciation, therefore, removed the Roman Church’s ability to hold even symbolic or titular claims to the previously renounced temporal patrimony of the Roman Empire.
• Premise 4: Following nobiliary law and historical succession principles, the temporal claims tied to the broader patrimony of the Roman Empire passed automatically to the Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia, the next-closest patriarchal successor as the direct successor of Pope St. Leo X (Guerios, 2015).
  
• Premise 5: The URRC, as the direct successor to Pope St. Leo X, assumed these patrimonial rights without the need for formal transfer, since the claims passed through hereditary and ecclesiastical succession, consistent with nobiliary law (Neil and Allen, 2014; Gavaldá y Castro and Arnaldo, 2015).
  
• Conclusion: The temporal patrimony of the Roman Church, specifically tied to the Roman Empire and the Holy Roman Empire, passed by nobiliary law to the Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia, affirming his legitimate claim to the temporal heritage of the Roman Empire and associated states.

4. The Legacy of the Kingdom of Ruthenia

• Premise 1: The Kingdom of Ruthenia (Rus' or Russia) was a medieval political entity established by Pope Innocent IV when Danilo Romanovich was crowned king (Fennell, 1983). While the Kingdom remained in the Eastern Orthodox rite, it maintained a significant political alliance with the Roman Papacy (Bougard and Sot, 2020).
  
• Premise 2: The Romanovich dynasty, ruling Ruthenia, itself part of the Rurikovich (Rurikid) dynasty, is historically part of the Old Russian State and the Byzantine tradition (Franklin and Shepard, 1996).

• Premise 3: After the dissolution of the Kingdom of Russia (Ruthenia), its lands were divided among other states, but the rights to the Kingdom legitimately reverted to its originator—the Roman Papacy—by nobiliary law and custom, thus making Rome the ecclesiastical successor to Ruthenia's temporal heritage (Heritage, 2023).
• Conclusion: The United Roman-Ruthenian Church, as the temporal successor of St. Peter, rightfully claims the temporal patrimony of Ruthenia, with the Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia inheriting the titles and rights associated with the Kingdom of Ruthenia.

5. Pontifical Imperial State of Rome-Ruthenia

• Premise 1: The Pontifical Imperial State of Rome-Ruthenia is the modern combination of the historic Pontifical Roman State and the Pontifical Kingdom of Ruthenia, representing the temporal patrimony of both the Roman Empire and Ruthenia (Old Russian State).
• Premise 2: While it neither holds nor seeks direct political territory, the Pontifical Imperial State functions as a titular secular authority of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church, representing the historic territories and maintaining the ecclesiastical claims.
• Premise 3: The state symbolises the unity of the Roman and Ruthenian patrimonies, reinforcing the dual temporal heritage that the Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia holds over both the Roman Empire and the Kingdom of Ruthenia.
• Conclusion: The Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia, as head of the Pontifical Imperial State, embodies the temporal sovereignty of both the Roman Empire and Ruthenia, through an unbroken lineage of ecclesiastical and nobiliary succession.

Conclusion:

By virtue of its Apostolic and temporal succession, the United Roman-Ruthenian Church—through its direct succession from Pope St. Leo X and its claim as temporal successor to the patrimony of St. Peter—legitimately inherits the temporal authority of the Roman Empire and the Kingdom of Ruthenia. The Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia, as the Papa-Catholicos of Rome-Ruthenia and the Supreme Pontiff of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church, stands as the legitimate heir to both the Roman Empire and the Kingdom of Ruthenia, forming the foundation of the modern Pontifical Imperial State of Rome-Ruthenia. Through nobiliary law, the temporal rights passed to him automatically, reinforcing his position as the legitimate temporal ecclesiastical heir to this vast patrimony.

References

Apostolic and Temporal Succession of Rutherford I. Pontifical Georgian Press. 2024.

Blaudeau P. Narrating Papal Authority (440–530): The Adaptation of the Liber Pontificalis. In Dunn GD, ed. The Bishop of Rome in Late Antiquity. Farnham: Routledge; 2015. ​

Bougard F, Sot M, eds. Liber, Gesta, Histoire: Ecclesiastical Memory in Medieval Europe. Cambridge University Press; 2020​.

Coulombe C. Europe and the Empire. Oxford University Press. 2020; 34(2). ​

Davis B. Pontiffs and the Governance of Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018​.

Deffenbaugh v. Röm-Frankfurt, Ed. Almanac of Würzburg. Pontifical Georgian Press. 2016-2024.

Fennell, J. The Crisis of Medieval Russia, 1200-1304. Longman. 1983.

Franklin, S., Shepard, J. The Emergence of Rus 750-1200. Longman. 1996.

Gavaldá y Castro, Rubén and Arnaldo I. A. Miranda Tumbarello. Fons Honorum: compendio de Derecho Nobiliario Europeo y Americano. Instituto Heraldico de Buenos Aires. 2015.

Geertman H, La Genesi del Liber pontificalis romano. Studies in Church History. Cambridge University Press. 2016.

Guerios, M. Dynastic and Nobility Law: The End of a Myth. (2015).

Heritage and Ecclesiastical Titles in the United Roman-Ruthenian Church. Il Nunzio Romano-Ruteno. 2023.

McKitterick R. The Papacy and Byzantium in the Liber Pontificalis. Papers of the British School at Rome. 2016. ​

Neil B, Allen P, eds. The Letters of Gelasius I: Pastor and Micro-Manager of the Church of Rome. Turnhout: Brepols; 2014. ​

Prodi P. The Papacy and the Papal States' Claims to Temporal Primacy. Renaissance Quarterly. 2019; 72(3).

Ullmann W. The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages. London: Cambridge University Press; 1970.

Vatican International Theological Commission. Catholic Teaching on Apostolic Succession. 1973. ‌